NOW VIEWINGReception
HomeJourneyCollectionsStoriesPathsMusic RoomGamesExploreMapDebateNews
Debate & reception

DebateContested

'Better Must Come' as party anthem: people's song or appropriation?

One side

A hopeful people's song

The other

Partisan appropriation of a shared record

What was argued

Two documented readings of Delroy Wilson's hit becoming a PNP campaign anthem in 1972: some hear a hopeful people's song that naturally spoke to the moment, others a partisan appropriation of a record meant for everyone. Neutral framing; no verdict.

The records this concerns

Delroy Wilson"Better Must Come" — Delroy WilsonPNP Musical Bandwagon (1972)

Sources

Reggae Routes; Jamaica Gleaner archive

Commentary

Manley's 1972 bandwagon: reggae as the sufferers' voice or a politician's prop?

One side

Reggae as authentic mobilizing voice of the poor

The other

Political co-optation of Rasta and roots symbolism

Michael Manley's PNP built its 1972 campaign around reggae, adopting Delroy Wilson's 'Better Must Come' as its theme, touring a 'bandwagon' of artists including Max Romeo and the Wailers, and pairing the music with the 'Rod of Correction' Manley said he received from Haile Selassie. Observers have argued this fused reggae's voice-of-the-sufferer authenticity with a genuine political movement for the poor; others read it as co-optation — parties harvesting Rasta symbols and roots songs (Romeo's 'Let the Power Fall', Byles's 'Beat Down Babylon') for electoral advantage while leaving the ghettos' conditions unchanged. Grounded in the Zapruder World essay on reggae and the 1972 election and Jamaica Observer's 'That Manley bandwagon.'.

Read the argument →

Debate

The rod of correction: sincere symbol or political theatre?

One side

Sincere invocation of scripture and Rastafari symbolism

The other

Manipulative political theatre

Two documented interpretations of the 'rod of correction' in 1972 campaigning: as a sincere invocation of scripture and Rastafari symbolism resonant with the electorate, or as manipulative political theatre borrowing sacred imagery for votes. Neutral framing; no verdict.

Read the argument →

All debate & reception →