NOW VIEWINGReception
HomeJourneyCollectionsStoriesPathsMusic RoomGamesExploreMapDebateNews
Debate & reception

DebateContested

'Wet Dream' and the BBC ban: protecting decency or prudish overreach?

One side

Protecting broadcast decency

The other

Prudish censorship of a Jamaican innuendo tradition

What was argued

Two documented positions on the 1969 BBC ban of Max Romeo's hit: the broadcaster framed it as protecting decency over an overtly suggestive lyric, while critics called it prudish overreach that ignored a Jamaican tradition of innuendo, and the record charted regardless. Neutral framing; no verdict.

The records this concerns

BBC broadcast ban on Max Romeo's 'Wet Dream' (1969)Max RomeoMento double-entendre

Sources

Jamaica Star archive; Jamaica Gleaner archive

Commentary

Manley's 1972 bandwagon: reggae as the sufferers' voice or a politician's prop?

One side

Reggae as authentic mobilizing voice of the poor

The other

Political co-optation of Rasta and roots symbolism

Michael Manley's PNP built its 1972 campaign around reggae, adopting Delroy Wilson's 'Better Must Come' as its theme, touring a 'bandwagon' of artists including Max Romeo and the Wailers, and pairing the music with the 'Rod of Correction' Manley said he received from Haile Selassie. Observers have argued this fused reggae's voice-of-the-sufferer authenticity with a genuine political movement for the poor; others read it as co-optation — parties harvesting Rasta symbols and roots songs (Romeo's 'Let the Power Fall', Byles's 'Beat Down Babylon') for electoral advantage while leaving the ghettos' conditions unchanged. Grounded in the Zapruder World essay on reggae and the 1972 election and Jamaica Observer's 'That Manley bandwagon.'.

Read the argument →

Debate

Mento's bawdy songs: rustic candour or colonial indecency?

One side

Rural working-class humour and candour

The other

Middle-class colonial indecency

Two documented positions on mento's sexual double-entendre, stated neutrally: defenders heard rural working-class humour and honest candour in the word-play, while respectable and colonial opinion condemned it as 'smutty' and low. Neutral framing; no verdict.

Read the argument →

All debate & reception →